Reviewer Recruitment Policy

Reviewer Recruitment Policy

The Journal of Sustainable Research in the Humanities is committed to providing objective and high-quality peer review for all submitted manuscripts by engaging specialized reviewers with expertise in the relevant research fields. The reviewer recruitment process adheres to the following principles:

1. Reviewer Selection Criteria:

  • Reviewers must be academic experts or experienced researchers in the manuscript’s subject area.

  • Preference is given to reviewers with a recognized research record and relevant publications within the journal’s scope.

  • Geographic and institutional diversity is considered to broaden the expertise base and minimize bias.

2. Sources for Reviewer Recruitment:

  • The journal’s database of previous and approved reviewers.

  • Recommendations from the editorial board and editorial members.

  • Author suggestions, with strict avoidance of any reviewer conflicts of interest.

  • Identification of new reviewers through recent scientific publications relevant to the field.

3. Ensuring Integrity and Impartiality:

  • Reviewers must disclose any conflicts of interest that may affect their objectivity in evaluating the manuscript.

  • The journal employs a Double-Blind Peer Review system to maintain anonymity between authors and reviewers.

4. Communication Procedures with Reviewers:

  • Reviewers receive an official invitation detailing the review requirements and deadlines.

  • Reviewers have the freedom to accept or decline the review request without any pressure.

5. Reviewer Database Development:

  • The journal regularly updates the reviewer database, monitoring reviewers’ performance and the quality of their reports.

  • High-performing reviewers are encouraged through certificates of appreciation or periodic awards.

6. Encouraging Training and Support:

  • The journal provides clear guidelines to new reviewers on how to conduct an objective and effective scientific review.

  • Participation in workshops and training courses to improve reviewing skills is actively encouraged.