Peer Review Policy

  1. Review System:
    The Journal of Sustainable Research in the Humanities adopts a double-blind peer review system, where reviewers do not know the identities of the authors, and vice versa, to ensure integrity and objectivity.

  2. Review Criteria:
    Submissions are evaluated based on the following standards:
    • Originality and scientific significance of the topic
    • Clarity of the research problem and objectives
    • Soundness of the scientific methodology
    • Proper citation and academic referencing
    • Consistency of results with the analysis
    • Quality of language and academic writing style

  3. Review Procedures:
    • The editorial board conducts an initial screening to ensure alignment with the journal’s scope and formatting requirements
    • The manuscript is assigned to at least two expert reviewers
    • The review process typically takes 1 to 3 weeks
    • Authors are notified of one of the following outcomes:

  • Acceptance without revision

  • Acceptance with minor revisions

  • Acceptance with major revisions

  • Rejection

  1. Review Ethics:
    • Reviewers must maintain full confidentiality and not use any content before publication
    • Reviewers must disclose any conflict of interest that may affect their objectivity
    • The journal reserves the right to replace a reviewer in case of delay or non-compliance with academic standards